Slovak Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Slovak
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Slovak Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
15.8%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
80.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovak Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 388,579,865 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 15.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.9% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Slovaks and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Slovaks influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Slovaks simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Jordan (15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Brazilian (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Venezuela (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and French (15.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants from Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants from Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants from Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants from Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Slovak Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slovak Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.100% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.2% | 89.8% |
Mean | 9.2% | 27.6% |
Median | 8.1% | 19.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 31.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 19.2% |
Correlation Details
Slovak Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 318,302,380 | 16.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 39,784,084 | 12.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 11,743,073 | 13.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 5,015,929 | 16.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 2,919,766 | 15.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 2,151,934 | 19.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 1,404,452 | 15.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 1,488,800 | 14.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 751,251 | 18.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 851,670 | 19.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 644,658 | 17.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 676,906 | 11.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 443,705 | 12.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 426,138 | 12.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 278,380 | 11.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 201,975 | 17.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 243,242 | 20.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 180,824 | 16.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 90,693 | 15.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.87% | 204,515 | 22.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 117,387 | 20.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 88,846 | 18.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 145,624 | 16.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 27,642 | 29.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 35,210 | 14.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.70% | 56,412 | 10.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 29,636 | 23.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 63,192 | 29.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.54% | 50,326 | 11.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 25,760 | 14.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.12% | 11,255 | 31.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.48% | 6,764 | 32.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.76% | 34,048 | 16.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.37% | 2,296 | 14.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.61% | 13,870 | 31.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.85% | 2,867 | 66.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.28% | 1,241 | 36.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.46% | 39,045 | 28.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 1,343 | 24.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.18% | 1,232 | 58.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.64% | 4,067 | 14.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.94% | 4,328 | 42.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.81% | 391 | 53.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.55% | 1,402 | 50.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39% | 1,111 | 47.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.96% | 639 | 23.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.66% | 1,807 | 22.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.94% | 3,348 | 28.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.27% | 74 | 100.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.08% | 408 | 90.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.58% | 505 | 62.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.35% | 1,730 | 45.1% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.37% | 339 | 30.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.32% | 1,345 | 29.5% |