Danish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Danish
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Danish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
13.6%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,554,581 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 13.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.58% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Danes and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Danes influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Danes simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Danes by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants from China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants from Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Danish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 53.8% | 51.2% |
| Range | 53.7% | 47.0% |
| Mean | 15.7% | 19.3% |
| Median | 14.4% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 24.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 12.3% |
Correlation Details
| Danish Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 350,965,493 | 17.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 67,184,165 | 11.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 23,192,436 | 11.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 8,492,440 | 11.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 2,874,148 | 12.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,738,510 | 10.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 1,343,296 | 13.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 1,543,781 | 10.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 1,101,606 | 10.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72% | 903,847 | 10.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 743,808 | 11.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 411,294 | 10.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 229,157 | 14.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.80% | 172,985 | 8.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 119,250 | 10.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 190,609 | 6.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 94,420 | 8.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.78% | 49,900 | 16.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 15,623 | 20.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 30,039 | 15.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.40% | 12,965 | 12.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.76% | 21,226 | 13.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 21,004 | 11.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 4,539 | 18.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23% | 3,580 | 24.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.70% | 14,672 | 18.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.42% | 11,978 | 12.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 8,908 | 27.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.43% | 7,989 | 31.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.62% | 951 | 51.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.42% | 707 | 13.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.71% | 2,566 | 30.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.20% | 1,667 | 23.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 4,890 | 13.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 8,812 | 8.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.70% | 1,960 | 5.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.05% | 770 | 43.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.68% | 2,275 | 9.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.21% | 3,556 | 23.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 1,005 | 13.3% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.17% | 5,306 | 20.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.19% | 2,869 | 24.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 970 | 35.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 222 | 23.1% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 284 | 5.6% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.43% | 2,937 | 32.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.11% | 1,463 | 14.3% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.36% | 793 | 4.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.66% | 141 | 50.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.78% | 2,946 | 31.1% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.46% | 112 | 14.3% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.82% | 1,328 | 20.7% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.53% | 416 | 48.4% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.37% | 204 | 44.4% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.82% | 784 | 5.2% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.83% | 875 | 28.6% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.85% | 104 | 50.0% |