Hungarian vs Canadian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Hungarian
Canadian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Hungarians
Canadians
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
47.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Canadian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,859,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,690,103 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 7.1%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | Canadian |
Minimum | 4.7% | 7.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 95.3% | 92.7% |
Mean | 36.7% | 34.1% |
Median | 26.3% | 25.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.4% | 41.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 37.3% | 26.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.9% | 27.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.5% | 26.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Scotch-Irish (16.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (16.5%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Hawaiian (16.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 49.0 /100 | #175 | Average 16.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 48.2 /100 | #176 | Average 16.5% |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |