Creek vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Native/Alaskan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Creek
Natives/Alaskans
27.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,486,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,027,149 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 73.3% |
| Range | 68.3% | 65.1% |
| Mean | 35.3% | 37.0% |
| Median | 34.4% | 36.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.7% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.3% | 42.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.6% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Natives/Alaskans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.99%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |