Kiowa vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
Native/Alaskan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
Natives/Alaskans
26.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,984,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,027,149 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 4.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 20.0% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 69.2% | 73.3% |
| Range | 49.2% | 65.1% |
| Mean | 34.9% | 37.0% |
| Median | 31.9% | 36.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.4% | 42.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Natives/Alaskans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Creek (27.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |