Okinawan vs Immigrants from Micronesia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,604,889 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,488,987 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 25.3%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Okinawan	Immigrants from Micronesia
Minimum	0.25%	1.0%
Maximum	12.5%	19.3%
Range	12.3%	18.3%
Mean	4.0%	7.2%
Median	3.7%	5.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.5%	4.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.0%	7.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.5%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.2%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.2%	4.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Okinawans by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 4.3%
Czechoslovakians	99.7 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.6 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 4.4%
Tlingit-Haida	99.6 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 4.4%
Okinawans	99.6 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.5 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 4.4%
Macedonians	99.4 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.4 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 4.4%
Slavs	99.4 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 4.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Thailand	14.0 /100 \| #212	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	13.3 /100 \| #213	Poor 5.5%
Iroquois	13.1 /100 \| #214	Poor 5.5%
Armenians	12.8 /100 \| #215	Poor 5.5%
Potawatomi	12.4 /100 \| #216	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	11.3 /100 \| #217	Poor 5.5%