Aleut vs Immigrants from Micronesia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,581,889 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,488,987 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Aleut	Immigrants from Micronesia
Minimum	1.6%	1.0%
Maximum	50.0%	19.3%
Range	48.4%	18.3%
Mean	10.4%	7.2%
Median	4.8%	5.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.3%	4.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.8%	7.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.5%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.1%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.9%	4.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Moldova (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from France (4.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Germany (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Romania (4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Native Hawaiians	98.0 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 4.6%
Immigrants \| Europe	97.9 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 4.6%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	97.9 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 4.6%
Yugoslavians	97.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 4.6%
Asians	97.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Romania	97.3 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Moldova	97.1 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 4.7%
Aleuts	97.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| France	96.9 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 4.7%
Laotians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Thailand	14.0 /100 \| #212	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	13.3 /100 \| #213	Poor 5.5%
Iroquois	13.1 /100 \| #214	Poor 5.5%
Armenians	12.8 /100 \| #215	Poor 5.5%
Potawatomi	12.4 /100 \| #216	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	11.3 /100 \| #217	Poor 5.5%