Maltese vs Immigrants from Micronesia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,965,353 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,488,987 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 34.6%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Maltese	Immigrants from Micronesia
Minimum	0.56%	1.0%
Maximum	31.1%	19.3%
Range	30.6%	18.3%
Mean	4.7%	7.2%
Median	3.3%	5.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.5%	4.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.5%	7.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.0%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.9%	4.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Maltese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.0%
Slovaks	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.0%
Poles	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.0%
Germans	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 4.0%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 4.0%
Italians	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 4.0%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 4.1%
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 4.1%
Zimbabweans	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 4.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 4.1%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 4.1%
Eastern Europeans	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 4.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	99.9 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 4.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 4.1%
Danes	99.9 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 4.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Thailand	14.0 /100 \| #212	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	13.3 /100 \| #213	Poor 5.5%
Iroquois	13.1 /100 \| #214	Poor 5.5%
Armenians	12.8 /100 \| #215	Poor 5.5%
Potawatomi	12.4 /100 \| #216	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	11.3 /100 \| #217	Poor 5.5%