Tlingit-Haida vs Asian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Asian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Asians
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Asian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,606,017 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,137,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 7.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Asian |
Minimum | 0.43% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 38.0% |
Range | 49.6% | 36.7% |
Mean | 16.8% | 11.5% |
Median | 15.6% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.7% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Asians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |