Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Average Family Size
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Chickasaw
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Chickasaw
3.58
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.19
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
6.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,145,550 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178 and weighted average of 3.58. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 3.19, a difference of 12.4%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.46 | 2.14 |
| Maximum | 4.29 | 4.35 |
| Range | 1.83 | 2.21 |
| Mean | 3.49 | 3.19 |
| Median | 3.46 | 3.16 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.15 | 3.04 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.90 | 3.32 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.75 | 0.28 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.48 | 0.38 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.47 | 0.37 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Hopi (3.60, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Yemen (3.60, a difference of 0.36%), Inupiat (3.63, a difference of 1.2%), Arapaho (3.64, a difference of 1.4%), and Tohono O'odham (3.53, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Pueblo | 100 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.79 |
| Pima | 100 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.75 |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.65 |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.64 |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.63 |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.60 |
| Hopi | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.60 |
| Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.58 |
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 3.53 |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 3.52 |
| Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 3.52 |
| Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 3.49 |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 3.49 |
| Ute | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 3.49 |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Portuguese (3.19, a difference of 0.0%), Cree (3.19, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (3.19, a difference of 0.030%), Syrian (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Italy (3.19, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 9.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Lebanese | 9.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 7.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 7.2 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 7.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Syrians | 6.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Cree | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Chickasaw | 6.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Portuguese | 6.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Italy | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Basques | 5.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Cherokee | 4.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.18 |
| Brazilians | 4.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.18 |