Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,495,550 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	Chickasaw
Minimum	0.53%	1.7%
Maximum	11.4%	17.6%
Range	10.8%	16.0%
Mean	4.6%	7.8%
Median	4.1%	7.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.1%	5.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.3%	9.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.2%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.1%	3.3%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Asians	97.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Romania	97.3 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Moldova	97.1 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 4.7%
Aleuts	97.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| France	96.9 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 4.7%
Laotians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| South America	3.1 /100 \| #237	Tragic 5.7%
Cherokee	2.7 /100 \| #238	Tragic 5.8%
Venezuelans	2.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 5.8%
Fijians	2.5 /100 \| #240	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	2.5 /100 \| #241	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	2.4 /100 \| #242	Tragic 5.8%
Somalis	2.3 /100 \| #243	Tragic 5.8%
Chickasaw	2.3 /100 \| #244	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	2.1 /100 \| #245	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	1.8 /100 \| #246	Tragic 5.8%
Iraqis	1.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 5.9%
Cree	1.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 5.9%
Tsimshian	1.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	1.0 /100 \| #251	Tragic 5.9%