Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Tsimshian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Tsimshian
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,718,815 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,607,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 12.8% | 16.0% |
| Range | 12.3% | 14.2% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 5.9% |
| Median | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Cree (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |