Native/Alaskan vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Tsimshian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Tsimshian
8.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,148,611 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,607,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 38.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 16.0% |
| Range | 34.4% | 14.2% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 5.9% |
| Median | 9.0% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Dominican (8.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (8.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Cree (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |