Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Tsimshian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Tsimshian
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
23.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,849,753 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,607,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 9.3%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 12.6% | 16.0% |
Range | 11.1% | 14.2% |
Mean | 5.4% | 5.9% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Lebanese (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Cree (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |