Bhutanese vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Tsimshian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Tsimshian
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,607,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 43.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 49.5% | 16.0% |
| Range | 48.9% | 14.2% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.9% |
| Median | 3.7% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Cree (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |