Pakistani vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
Cherokee
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,803,446 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 27.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.3% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 31.6% | 37.0% |
| Median | 22.6% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 42.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.5% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.4% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |