Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Cherokee
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,543,414 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 41.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Cherokee |
Minimum | 3.9% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 35.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.2% | 90.0% |
Mean | 16.8% | 37.0% |
Median | 16.1% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 42.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |