Northern European vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Northern European
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Northern Europeans
Cherokee
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Northern European vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,261,787 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 23.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Northern European | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 57.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 54.0% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 28.3% | 37.0% |
| Median | 25.0% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.0% | 42.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.3% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Northern Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |