Pakistani vs Venezuelan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
Venezuelan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
Venezuelans
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Venezuelan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,803,446 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,310,735 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Venezuelan |
Minimum | 7.7% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 37.3% |
Range | 92.3% | 35.0% |
Mean | 31.6% | 18.9% |
Median | 22.6% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.4% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Venezuelans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Venezuelans are Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |