Immigrants from Denmark vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Cherokee
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,190,305 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 20.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 24.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Cherokee |
Minimum | 5.3% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.7% | 90.0% |
Mean | 30.0% | 37.0% |
Median | 22.5% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.7% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 42.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |