Ottawa vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ottawa
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ottawa
Celtics
26.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,782,789 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 26.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 14.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ottawa | Celtic |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 66.7% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 31.8% | 33.1% |
| Median | 27.2% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.0% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.2% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ottawa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |