West Indian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
West Indian
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
West Indians
Celtics
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,099,029 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 1.9%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian | Celtic |
Minimum | 7.2% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 52.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 45.1% | 88.9% |
Mean | 21.3% | 33.1% |
Median | 20.4% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.1% | 39.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to West Indians and Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Liberian (22.4%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |