Mexican American Indian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Celtics
23.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,510,714 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 23.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 2.8%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Celtic |
Minimum | 7.7% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.3% | 88.9% |
Mean | 32.2% | 33.1% |
Median | 29.8% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.6% | 39.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.53%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |