Ottawa vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ottawa
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ottawa
Celtics
19.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,714,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 14.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | Celtic |
Minimum | 6.1% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 46.9% | 70.9% |
Range | 40.9% | 67.6% |
Mean | 20.4% | 25.7% |
Median | 19.1% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ottawa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |