Moroccan vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Moroccan
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Moroccans
Celtics
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 8.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Celtic |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.0% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 33.1% |
| Median | 20.6% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |