Malaysian vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Malaysian
Navajo
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Malaysians
Navajo
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,243,890 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,292,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 71.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Navajo |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 59.2% | 98.2% |
| Mean | 21.1% | 40.4% |
| Median | 18.5% | 37.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 52.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 30.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 22.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
| German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 3.7%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |