Luxembourger vs Creek Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Creek
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Creek
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Creek Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,404,623 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 48.3%.
![Luxembourger vs Creek Male Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/male-poverty/luxembourgers-vs-creek-male-poverty-chart.webp)
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Creek |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 17.8% | 50.8% |
Range | 16.3% | 48.5% |
Mean | 6.7% | 17.8% |
Median | 6.1% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Bangladesh (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Senegalese (14.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Bahamian (14.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Caribbean (14.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Senegal (14.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 14.0% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 14.1% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 14.1% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 14.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 14.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |