Luxembourger vs Chickasaw Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Chickasaw
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Chickasaw
28.5%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
86.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Chickasaw Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,536,891 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 28.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,526,184 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 34.4%, a difference of 20.7%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 12.2% | 21.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.8% | 78.7% |
| Mean | 35.5% | 47.2% |
| Median | 29.4% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 20.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.9% | 19.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Mother Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from North America (28.5%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (28.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South America (28.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Denmark (28.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Danish (28.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 88.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 88.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Samoans | 88.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 88.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Danes | 87.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 28.5% |
| South Africans | 86.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 86.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 86.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 86.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 86.1 /100 | #146 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Syrians | 85.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Serbians | 85.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.9 /100 | #151 | Good 28.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (34.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Central American Indian (34.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Cherokee (34.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 33.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 34.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 34.2% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |