Alaskan Athabascan vs Crow Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Crow
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Crow
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Crow Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,198,506 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 22.1%, a difference of 54.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Crow |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 69.0% | 50.2% |
| Range | 68.2% | 44.6% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 26.8% |
| Median | 15.9% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 39.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 23.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.2%), Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 5.6%), Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |