Immigrants from Oceania vs Crow Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Crow
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Crow
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Crow Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,198,506 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 22.1%, a difference of 66.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Crow |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 44.6% | 50.2% |
| Range | 33.9% | 44.6% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 26.8% |
| Median | 15.5% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 39.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 23.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.2%), Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 5.6%), Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |