Iroquois vs Sudanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Sudanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Sudanese
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
6.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Sudanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,883,961 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Sudanese |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 26.1% |
Range | 21.3% | 25.3% |
Mean | 7.4% | 6.8% |
Median | 5.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Sudanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Fiji (5.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Cajun (5.6%, a difference of 0.18%), South American (5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |