Iroquois vs Uruguayan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
 Uruguayan
 Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Uruguayans
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
25.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,309,932 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
 
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Uruguayan | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.92% | 
| Maximum | 22.9% | 22.4% | 
| Range | 21.3% | 21.5% | 
| Mean | 7.4% | 6.6% | 
| Median | 5.9% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 5.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Uruguayans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Liberian (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% | 
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% | 
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% | 
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% | 
| Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |