Immigrants from Yemen vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Immigrants from Oceania
12.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,374,937 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 154.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 40.5% | 12.9% |
| Range | 38.6% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 6.0% |
| Median | 8.6% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Yup'ik (13.4%, a difference of 4.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 8.0%), Pima (11.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 14.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |