Hopi vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hopi
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hopi
Immigrants from Oceania
7.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hopi vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,623,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 41.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hopi | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 21.7% | 12.9% |
Range | 20.0% | 11.9% |
Mean | 9.0% | 6.0% |
Median | 8.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hopi by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Armenia (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (7.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and British West Indian (7.1%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |