Barbadian vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,986,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 25.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Barbadian	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	0.52%	1.0%
Maximum	15.7%	12.9%
Range	15.2%	11.9%
Mean	6.0%	6.0%
Median	5.5%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.5%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.2%	7.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.7%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.6%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.5%	2.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.83%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #267	Tragic 6.2%
Alaska Natives	0.2 /100 \| #268	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 6.2%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 6.2%
Colville	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 6.3%
Barbadians	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 6.3%
Choctaw	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 6.3%
Yaqui	0.1 /100 \| #276	Tragic 6.3%
Indonesians	0.1 /100 \| #277	Tragic 6.3%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.1 /100 \| #278	Tragic 6.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 6.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 6.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 6.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	79.9 /100 \| #145	Good 5.0%
Mongolians	79.8 /100 \| #146	Good 5.0%
Syrians	78.7 /100 \| #147	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%
Brazilians	78.3 /100 \| #150	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%