Cree vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cree
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cree
Immigrants from Oceania
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,066,052 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 17.3%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cree | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 34.0% | 12.9% |
| Range | 31.9% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 6.0% |
| Median | 6.3% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cree by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Tsimshian (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (5.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |