Immigrants from Yemen vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Immigrants from South Central Asia
12.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,374,937 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,887,426 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 197.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 40.5% | 12.4% |
Range | 38.6% | 11.8% |
Mean | 12.1% | 3.6% |
Median | 8.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Yup'ik (13.4%, a difference of 4.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 8.0%), Pima (11.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 14.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |