Immigrants from Lithuania vs Sri Lankan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Sri Lankan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Sri Lankans
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
72.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Sri Lankan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,432,978 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,204,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 17.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.96% |
Maximum | 8.5% | 36.6% |
Range | 7.1% | 35.6% |
Mean | 4.0% | 6.8% |
Median | 3.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Delaware (5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |