Immigrants from Lithuania vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Czechoslovakian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Czechoslovakians
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,432,978 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 0.71%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 8.5% | 21.7% |
Range | 7.1% | 20.4% |
Mean | 4.0% | 6.9% |
Median | 3.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Czechoslovakians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |