Immigrants from Lithuania vs Syrian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Syrian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Syrians
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Syrian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,432,978 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,506,775 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 16.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Syrian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.72% |
| Maximum | 8.5% | 25.0% |
| Range | 7.1% | 24.3% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 6.3% |
| Median | 3.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |