Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Mongolian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Mongolian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Mongolians
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Mongolian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,184,903 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,546,705 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.54%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Mongolian |
Minimum | 0.41% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 52.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.5% | 97.3% |
Mean | 17.1% | 17.1% |
Median | 13.3% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Mongolians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Armenia (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Europe (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |