American vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
American
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Americans
Chinese
12.1%
MALE POVERTY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 579,982,816 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 39.6%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50568/505685ed5cfcc20072ee5dca45a37db96415d663" alt="American vs Chinese Male Poverty"
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.36% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 77.0% | 29.4% |
Range | 76.7% | 28.2% |
Mean | 19.4% | 9.7% |
Median | 15.8% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Americans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Nonimmigrants (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (12.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Cambodia (12.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Panama (12.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Panamanians | 6.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 5.4 /100 | #206 | Tragic 12.0% |
Malaysians | 5.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #208 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Azores | 4.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 12.0% |
Moroccans | 4.2 /100 | #210 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.0 /100 | #211 | Tragic 12.1% |
Americans | 3.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.1% |
Japanese | 2.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 2.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 2.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.2% |
German Russians | 2.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bermudans | 2.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |