Soviet Union vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Chinese
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
60.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,503,005 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 27.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 23.2% | 29.4% |
| Range | 22.4% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 9.7% |
| Median | 8.4% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |