Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chinese
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,989,271 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 27.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 47.8% | 29.4% |
| Range | 46.7% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 9.7% |
| Median | 10.9% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |