Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chinese
12.2%
MALE POVERTY
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,712,457 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 40.3%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.066% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 32.1% | 29.4% |
Range | 32.0% | 28.2% |
Mean | 10.6% | 9.7% |
Median | 9.2% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Cambodia (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), German Russian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Bermudan (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #208 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Azores | 4.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 12.0% |
Moroccans | 4.2 /100 | #210 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.0 /100 | #211 | Tragic 12.1% |
Americans | 3.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.1% |
Japanese | 2.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 2.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 2.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.2% |
German Russians | 2.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bermudans | 2.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.2% |
Ugandans | 2.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.1 /100 | #222 | Tragic 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |