Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chinese
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,688,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 8.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 29.4% |
| Range | 20.9% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 9.7% |
| Median | 7.3% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |