Slovene vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
Chinese
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,189,705 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 15.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slovene | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.61% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 29.4% |
Range | 46.1% | 28.2% |
Mean | 11.1% | 9.7% |
Median | 8.8% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |