South American vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Chinese
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
53.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,234,153 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 28.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 22.6% | 29.4% |
| Range | 21.6% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 9.7% |
| Median | 10.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Colombia (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
| Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |