Finnish vs Jordanian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Finnish
Jordanian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Finns
Jordanians
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Jordanian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,315,970 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,386,715 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.45%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Jordanian |
Minimum | 3.8% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 47.7% | 30.3% |
Range | 43.9% | 28.2% |
Mean | 12.3% | 10.5% |
Median | 10.8% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Jordanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |