Chickasaw vs South American Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Chickasaw
South American
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Chickasaw
South Americans
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs South American Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,371,298 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 0.63%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | South American |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 12.7% |
| Maximum | 62.8% | 66.7% |
| Range | 56.3% | 53.9% |
| Mean | 27.4% | 30.1% |
| Median | 27.9% | 29.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.9% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.3% | 32.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and South Americans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Native/Alaskan (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iraq (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (28.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Nicaraguan (28.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Nigerians | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Kenyans | 99.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Nicaraguans | 99.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.8 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |